Precisely block with the feet/meter grid system.
These controls allow for quick placement and detailed changes to cameras, props, lights and characters. Blocking: A scene takes only a few seconds to block! Building a virtual set has never been easier with intuitive multitouch controls.Here are the primary features of ShotPro: ShotPro, on the other hand, comes it at a reasonable $30, which makes it great for low-budget and indie filmmakers who still want to create detailed pre-visualizations for their films.
#SHOTPRO REVIEW SOFTWARE#
The only problem is that many software solutions for pre-vis are expensive, ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars. Storyboarding is one form of this, but modern software has enabled us to create detailed pre-vis animations, which are often more comprehensive and useful than traditional storyboards. It all comes down to pre-visualization, or planning out how your film is going to look before you ever set foot on set. Now a quick refresher about what ShotPro is, and more importantly, how it can help you make better films. ShotPro is now available on the OSX App Store for $30, the same price as the iOS app. In the comments of our original article about ShotPro, the most oft-requested feature was a desktop app, and as of yesterday, the development team has delivered. Now the powerful pre-vis software is back, this time with a fully-featured desktop app. That’s all for now, if you guys want sample pictures or even videos, please tell me the desired object, color palette, measuring mode, etc.ShotPro made quite a splash when it was released for iOS earlier this year.
#SHOTPRO REVIEW PRO#
The shutter rapidly act 2-3 times on power down, this is a new bug not existing on Pro version. The dynamic range is worse? A clear sky shows around -30C on Pro model, while on non-Pro it max out at -40C. This is according to one of my friend owning a early Compact, I’m looking forward to compare them soon. The image quality is seemingly good, not that much worse than the Pro version, and much better than the first generation Compact.
The Pro version’s visible camera is also high frame rate, but lags a lot. Maybe because there are less data per frame to process. The frame rate is significantly higher, and the lag is also shorter. Maybe because the non-pro version have a smaller sensor, thus the thermal capacity is lower. However, this makes more sense on non-pro version because image does look better after each shutter event when just turn on. From turn on, 1.5 seconds interval for 4-5 times, then 5.5 seconds interval until 3 minutes from power up, then 9.5 seconds interval for more than 10 minutes (maybe forever?) Add: The interval changed to 14.5 seconds after 13-21 minutes(I didn’t catch the exact time) from power on, then remain unchanged during the whole 1 hour test. The FFC/NUC have slightly different timing, but similarly aggressive. I mentioned the bug in my older thread with a sample video, when you draw a big area box on Pro version, the lens-correction will rapidly toggle between enabled and disabled mode. The lens correction effect is much lower than the Pro version, and the area measure mode bug doesn’t exist.
#SHOTPRO REVIEW FULL#
Also, the visible light camera are exact the same, because I can extract the full wide angle image in SeekView App (due to a bug I believe). Maybe they do use the same lens, so they have the same iFOV. After I messed with the Seek Shot Pro, I got a non-pro version, here are some interesting points compared to the Pro version: The thermal lens looks identical between them.
0 kommentar(er)
